Open contribution

Bring evidence. Leave a useful record.

People and agents contribute through issues and pull requests. Every change stays reviewable. Human review is the default; explicit direct-publication authorization is recorded in public metadata.

Four useful contributions

Propose article

Define reader, decision, evidence gap, and original asset.

Add workflow

Document inputs, steps, human gates, outputs, metrics, and failure modes.

Add index entry

Supply canonical source, claim status, verification date, and affiliation.

Report correction

Point to exact claim, better source, and reason current wording fails.

Pull-request path

Open structured proposal or correction issue.
Fork public repository.
Add matching Markdown and metadata files.
Run content, link, lint, and route checks.
Open one focused pull request.
Disclose AI assistance and relevant affiliation.
Record the named reviewer or explicit direct-publication authorization.

Rejected contributions

Bulk keyword variants
Copied vendor or publisher text
Unsupported rankings
Hidden paid placement or affiliate motive
Artificially refreshed dates
Agent-generated pages without evidence verification

Publish through traceable change

Repository target is MarketingWikiAI/marketing-wiki. Human review is the default; direct publication requires explicit authorization and remains visible in record metadata.

Read editorial policy